Research to presentation maker
Start with the research. End with a finished deck.
When your presentation needs an evidence trail, start with the full paper. We shape its methods, results, and conclusions for your audience and deliver an editable PPTX plus PDF.
Reviewed delivery in 24-72 hours after complete inputs, payment, and explicit submission. You stay the subject-matter expert.
FICTIONAL PAPER · NOT A REAL PUBLICATION
Neighborhood Tree Canopy and Summer Indoor Heat: A Fictional Observational Study
- 1Why it matters
- 2The question
- 3Design
- 4Measures
- 5Association
- 6Limits
- 7Conclusion
- 8Questions
THE FULL-PAPER MAP · ILLUSTRATIVE
Let the study guide the slide story.
This fictional map shows the relationship between paper sections and slides. Your request starts with one complete primary paper, then an audience and slide count or duration.
Paper sections, in order
SOURCE DRAWER · Methods · [SOURCE PAGE]
Observational design, sample of [PAPER-SUPPLIED SAMPLE SIZE], and [MEASURE DEFINITION].
2 cards draw on this section: 3, 4.
- SLIDE 3From this section
Study design at a glance
Observational · n = [PAPER-SUPPLIED SAMPLE SIZE]
Paper-reported fact↳ Methods · [SOURCE PAGE]
- SLIDE 4From this section
How canopy and heat were measured
[MEASURE DEFINITION]
Paper-reported fact↳ Methods · [FIGURE OR TABLE REFERENCE]
- SLIDE 1
Why indoor heat is a neighborhood question
Paraphrase of the authors’ framing.
Paraphrase↳ Background · [SOURCE PAGE] · cited refs
- SLIDE 2
What the authors asked
“[DIRECT QUOTE , RESEARCH QUESTION]”
Direct quotation↳ Background · [SOURCE PAGE]
- SLIDE 5
The reported association
[REPORTED RESULT] ([CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FROM PAPER])
Paper-reported fact↳ Results · [FIGURE OR TABLE REFERENCE] · [SOURCE PAGE]
- SLIDE 6
What limits the claim
[AUTHOR-STATED LIMITATION] · association, not causation
Limitation / conflict↳ Limitations · [SOURCE PAGE]
- SLIDE 7
What the authors concluded
[PAPER-REPORTED CONCLUSION]
Paper-reported fact↳ Conclusion · [SOURCE PAGE]
- SLIDE 8
Questions for the room
[GENERATED DISCUSSION QUESTION , REVIEW REQUIRED]
Suggestion , not a finding↳ Generated , no paper source
- BACKUP B1
Presenter’s critique (backup)
[USER INTERPRETATION , REVIEW REQUIRED]
User interpretation · review↳ Your note · near Discussion [SOURCE PAGE]
- BACKUP B2
Outcomes by housing type? (backup)
The paper doesn’t clearly report this. Not filled in.
Missing / unclear↳ Not clearly reported , left open
What each label means
- Direct quotation , exact paper wording, kept with page and context.
- Paper-reported fact , a value or fact the paper states, linked to section, page, figure or table.
- Paraphrase , rewritten wording of a supported point, linked to its source.
- User interpretation · review , your own inference or critique , never attributed to the authors.
- Suggestion , not a finding , generated structure, titles, or framing.
- Missing / unclear , the paper doesn’t clearly support it; left visible, not filled.
- Limitation / conflict , a caveat, definition, or scope boundary that qualifies a claim.
LIMITATION SPOTLIGHT
A clear argument keeps its caveats.
A deck should help the audience understand what the authors found and what the study cannot establish. Source-grounded wording, references, and attributed figures keep those boundaries visible.
- Author-stated limitations stay attached to their page.
- Association is never rephrased as cause.
- Gaps the paper doesn’t answer stay marked as open.
What limits the claim
Limitation · [AUTHOR-STATED LIMITATION] , Limitations, [SOURCE PAGE]
Design boundary · Observational: shows association, not causation.
Open · Housing-type differences not clearly reported , left unfilled.
DISCUSSION CARDS · GENERATED, REVIEW REQUIRED
Make room for the questions behind the findings.
Prompts are suggestions anchored to a section. Keep, rework, or drop each one , they aren’t the authors’ words.
- ANCHORED TO · Limitations
[GENERATED DISCUSSION QUESTION , REVIEW REQUIRED] on how [AUTHOR-STATED LIMITATION] affects local use.
Status: Needs review - ANCHORED TO · Methods
[GENERATED DISCUSSION QUESTION , REVIEW REQUIRED] on whether [MEASURE DEFINITION] fits our setting.
Status: Needs review - ANCHORED TO · Discussion
[GENERATED DISCUSSION QUESTION , REVIEW REQUIRED] on what an association can and can’t tell practitioners.
Status: Needs review
Your paper already contains the evidence.
Try Before You Buy: $5 (exactly 4 representative slides) · Research Deck: $19 (up to 12 slides) · Deep Dive Deck: $29 (up to 20 slides). Every offer includes editable PPTX and PDF. Full decks include source-grounded notes. No subscription, automatic upgrade, or credit toward a later purchase.
What happens after you start?
In the app, provide one full paper and your audience, then choose slides or duration. Pay for the offer and explicitly submit. We correct service-caused errors without a new purchase; material scope changes are separate work.